Be Who You Are (Jean Klein)
European Vedanta
[My 4-star Amazon review (NDA) of âBe Who you Areâ by Jean Klein.]
Circa 1980, when I was living in Marin County, my roommateâs brother, Larry Cook, who later became a spiritual teacher known as Lawrence, introduced me to Jean Kleinâs teachings via Kleinâs first book, âBe Who You Are,âoriginally published in 1978. When Klein (1912-1998) visited nearby Berkeley, I attended a couple of his satsangs and also had a personal meeting with him. Years later, I attended one of Kleinâs retreats (at Mt. Madonna Center, just outside of Santa Cruz) and had another meeting with him. I also met with Klein in Del Mar, California.
Lawrence described Kleinâs teachings as âEuropean Vedanta,â and I think that is an apropos description. Klein, a doctor and musicologist, also into art and architecture, was a true Renaissance man, and in âBe Who You Areâ he quotes or refers to Guenon, Kipling, Schopenhauer, Musset, Plato, Bach, Goethe, and a few other such icons. Klein has some interesting takes on art and architecture relative to spiritual life. For example, regarding art, he writes:
âCertain painters, when they wish to compose the subject of a picture, assemble objects according to their passing fancy, taking one of them as a centre around which they harmonize all others. Other artists on the contrary, set aside any idea of a centre. They observe the outline of the objects, the way they catch the light, the parts that are shaded, the relationship of space to space, so that no one object is more prominent than any other in the final arrangement, to such an extent that the presence of each object seems to eliminate that of the others. An ensemble is thus obtained, which has neither centre nor outline, and whose presence loses itself in the void. It might be said that all authentic works of art have the property of eliminating themselves (as objects), giving place to Ultimate Reality.â
Klein spent a number of years in India studying yoga and Advaita Vedanta before becoming a teacher who traveled the world enlightening disciples, and his essential teachings are on full display in âBe Who You Are.â For me it was a trip in time rereading a text I first read more than thirty years ago. Because my perspective on Advaita Vedanta is different now than it was then, I find myself in disagreement with Klein on a number of points.
First off, I reject Kleinâs world-denying philosophy. He writes: âAfter all, the body is nothing but a notion which has been built up and put together by the mindâ¦â This is nonsense. Animals and insects lack minds. How did they get bodies? Klein writes: âTo understand this [spiritual] search, we must rid ourselves of one foregone conclusion, that is, the idea that objects exist independently of he who observes them.â I reject this primacy-of consciousness point of view. I fully believe that the laptop Iâm using to write this review exists as it is independently of my perception of it. Elsewhere Klein writes: âThe ego appears and the world comes into being. World and ego are one.â Again, I reject this absurd, solipsistic philosophic perspective.
Like many Advaita Vedanta proponents (such as Adyashanti), Klein is critical of mysticism, and like these critics, itâs because he doesnât understand true mysticism. Interestingly enough, Klein writes: âEach breathing out expresses an entire surrender of the creature to God. And each inspiration signifies the return of the divine influx.â If Klein had understood true mysticism, heâd have known that itâs all about receiving this divine, en-Light-ening influx.
Klein champions an apophatic approach to Self-realization, and his teachings reflect the influence of his friend J. Krishnamurti. Here are a few examples of his Dharma:Â âThe state of listening is the first true step on the path.â This type of listening is an âeffortless attention devoid of any strain.â âThe unknown always reveals itself spontaneously and independently of ourselves. We should therefore avoid any wish to seize, to grasp or to force anything.â
The idea of spirititual discipline is anthema to Klein. He writes: âAll disciplines are fixations; disciplines exclude everything, except the one thing that one wishes to concentrate upon. Thus one establishes a dictatorship over oneself and all understanding is jeopardized. What is absolutely necessary is attention without strain⦠Such a result (Self-realization] can only be brought about in the total absence of any effort, by the simple virtue of discernment.â
The problem with a purely effortless approach to Self-realization is that it doesnât work, and Klein contradicts himself by âsmuggling inâ allusions to effort. First off, one cannot begin to listen and develop discernment without an effort. Secondly, Klein recommends âfrequent repetitions of an inner attitude⦠deep relaxation accompanied by visualization of the body as being more and more fluid and transparentâ¦â Klein writes: âWe must remain on the watch a long, long timeâ¦â Laughably, even though Klein disses disciplines, he refers to spiritual students as âdisciples.â
I am now a spiritual teacher myself, and although I believe non-resistance, or effortlessness, is an important component of integral spirituality, I believe it is just one-half of the en-Light-enment âequation.â Without the âvoltageâ supplied by a complementary practice of presence + oneness (or communion), which is a kind of holding on, just letting go and letting be will not âproduce,â or unveil en-Light-enment.
Even though Klein was a medical man, I donât think he was very astute regarding nutrition. He writes: âAll acid foods should, I repeat, be avoided because they destroy the machine and empty it of its substance.â This is rubbish. Even though an optimal diet is predominately alkaline, an individual also needs acid foods. Klein informs us that âthe most balanced diet is based on unrefined cereals.â Again, pure rubbish. Moreover, unbeknownst to Klein, most grains are acid forming.
Even though Iâm critical of Kleinâs teachings, I still think heâs an Advaita Vedanta guru/teacher worth reading, along with Ramana Maharshi, Sri Nisargadatta Mahaharaj, and Robert Adams. Moreover, I never knew him to be
Consequently, after considerable inner debate, I have, tentatively, decided to give this book four stars instead of three.
[My 4-star Amazon review (NDA) of âBe Who you Areâ by Jean Klein.]
Circa 1980, when I was living in Marin County, my roommateâs brother, Larry Cook, who later became a spiritual teacher known as Lawrence, introduced me to Jean Kleinâs teachings via Kleinâs first book, âBe Who You Are,âoriginally published in 1978. When Klein (1912-1998) visited nearby Berkeley, I attended a couple of his satsangs and also had a personal meeting with him. Years later, I attended one of Kleinâs retreats (at Mt. Madonna Center, just outside of Santa Cruz) and had another meeting with him. I also met with Klein in Del Mar, California.
Lawrence described Kleinâs teachings as âEuropean Vedanta,â and I think that is an apropos description. Klein, a doctor and musicologist, also into art and architecture, was a true Renaissance man, and in âBe Who You Areâ he quotes or refers to Guenon, Kipling, Schopenhauer, Musset, Plato, Bach, Goethe, and a few other such icons. Klein has some interesting takes on art and architecture relative to spiritual life. For example, regarding art, he writes:
âCertain painters, when they wish to compose the subject of a picture, assemble objects according to their passing fancy, taking one of them as a centre around which they harmonize all others. Other artists on the contrary, set aside any idea of a centre. They observe the outline of the objects, the way they catch the light, the parts that are shaded, the relationship of space to space, so that no one object is more prominent than any other in the final arrangement, to such an extent that the presence of each object seems to eliminate that of the others. An ensemble is thus obtained, which has neither centre nor outline, and whose presence loses itself in the void. It might be said that all authentic works of art have the property of eliminating themselves (as objects), giving place to Ultimate Reality.â
Klein spent a number of years in India studying yoga and Advaita Vedanta before becoming a teacher who traveled the world enlightening disciples, and his essential teachings are on full display in âBe Who You Are.â For me it was a trip in time rereading a text I first read more than thirty years ago. Because my perspective on Advaita Vedanta is different now than it was then, I find myself in disagreement with Klein on a number of points.
First off, I reject Kleinâs world-denying philosophy. He writes: âAfter all, the body is nothing but a notion which has been built up and put together by the mindâ¦â This is nonsense. Animals and insects lack minds. How did they get bodies? Klein writes: âTo understand this [spiritual] search, we must rid ourselves of one foregone conclusion, that is, the idea that objects exist independently of he who observes them.â I reject this primacy-of consciousness point of view. I fully believe that the laptop Iâm using to write this review exists as it is independently of my perception of it. Elsewhere Klein writes: âThe ego appears and the world comes into being. World and ego are one.â Again, I reject this absurd, solipsistic philosophic perspective.
Like many Advaita Vedanta proponents (such as Adyashanti), Klein is critical of mysticism, and like these critics, itâs because he doesnât understand true mysticism. Interestingly enough, Klein writes: âEach breathing out expresses an entire surrender of the creature to God. And each inspiration signifies the return of the divine influx.â If Klein had understood true mysticism, heâd have known that itâs all about receiving this divine, en-Light-ening influx.
Klein champions an apophatic approach to Self-realization, and his teachings reflect the influence of his friend J. Krishnamurti. Here are a few examples of his Dharma:Â âThe state of listening is the first true step on the path.â This type of listening is an âeffortless attention devoid of any strain.â âThe unknown always reveals itself spontaneously and independently of ourselves. We should therefore avoid any wish to seize, to grasp or to force anything.â
The idea of spirititual discipline is anthema to Klein. He writes: âAll disciplines are fixations; disciplines exclude everything, except the one thing that one wishes to concentrate upon. Thus one establishes a dictatorship over oneself and all understanding is jeopardized. What is absolutely necessary is attention without strain⦠Such a result (Self-realization] can only be brought about in the total absence of any effort, by the simple virtue of discernment.â
The problem with a purely effortless approach to Self-realization is that it doesnât work, and Klein contradicts himself by âsmuggling inâ allusions to effort. First off, one cannot begin to listen and develop discernment without an effort. Secondly, Klein recommends âfrequent repetitions of an inner attitude⦠deep relaxation accompanied by visualization of the body as being more and more fluid and transparentâ¦â Klein writes: âWe must remain on the watch a long, long timeâ¦â Laughably, even though Klein disses disciplines, he refers to spiritual students as âdisciples.â
I am now a spiritual teacher myself, and although I believe non-resistance, or effortlessness, is an important component of integral spirituality, I believe it is just one-half of the en-Light-enment âequation.â Without the âvoltageâ supplied by a complementary practice of presence + oneness (or communion), which is a kind of holding on, just letting go and letting be will not âproduce,â or unveil en-Light-enment.
Even though Klein was a medical man, I donât think he was very astute regarding nutrition. He writes: âAll acid foods should, I repeat, be avoided because they destroy the machine and empty it of its substance.â This is rubbish. Even though an optimal diet is predominately alkaline, an individual also needs acid foods. Klein informs us that âthe most balanced diet is based on unrefined cereals.â Again, pure rubbish. Moreover, unbeknownst to Klein, most grains are acid forming.
Even though Iâm critical of Kleinâs teachings, I still think heâs an Advaita Vedanta guru/teacher worth reading, along with Ramana Maharshi, Sri Nisargadatta Mahaharaj, and Robert Adams. Moreover, I never knew him to be
Consequently, after considerable inner debate, I have, tentatively, decided to give this book four stars instead of three.