Adi Da (a.k.a. Franklin Jones, Bubba Free John, Da Free John, Da Love-Ananda, et.al.), who passed in 2008, was, in my opinion, the greatest guru since Ramana Maharshi. Iâm a huge proponent of Daâs spiritual teachings (as evidenced by the âstampâ of his teachings on mine)--but I have major disdain for some parts of his teachings, particularly those that disparage (and misrepresent) certain other spiritual traditions.
In this article, Iâm going to focus on Daâs deconstruction of Kashmir Shaivism, because, from my perspective, his âdeconstructionâ of this great tradition is grossly error-ridden, and so Iâm moved to rebut it.
In Daâs text âSantosha Adidamâ, he describes the Four Ways, or Means, of Kashmir Shaivism thus:
âThe âIndividual Wayâ (or the Way of âabsorption in the Objectâ) is the first (or most âinferiorâ) step in the progressive path of Kashmir Shaivism, and it corresponds to the Devotional and Yogic disciplines associated with the fourth stage of life in both its âbasicâ and âadvancedâ phases).
The âEnergetic Wayâ (or the Way of âabsorption in Energyâ) is the second (or somewhat more advanced) step in the same path, and it corresponds to the fourth stage of life in its fully âadvancedâ phase and to the fifth stage of life as a whole.
The âDivine Wayâ (or the âsuperior Way of âabsorption in the Voidâ) of Kashmir Shaivism suggests the process (and the potential for Realization) that coresponds to the sixth stage of life.
The âNull Wayâ (or the most âsuperiorâ Way of âabsorption in Blissâ) in Kashmir Shaivism suggests the fulfillment of the process (or the actual achievement of the Realization) that corresponds to (or is potential within) the sixth stage of life.â
Those who have studied (and grok) the foremost texts on Kashnir Shaivism (such as Jaideva Singhâs âThe Doctrine of Recognitionâ and Deba Brata SenSharmaâs âThe Philosophy of Sadhanaâ) will rail at Daâs specious descriptions of the Four Means.
For example, the âEnergetic Wayâ (Saktopaya) implies communion with, and conductivity, of Shakti. It is the same âWayâ of Spirit-reception, or of Shaktipat Yoga, that Da practiced in his own sadhana (detailed in his autobiography âThe Knee of Listeningâ). Interestingly enough, prominent Kashmir Shaivism scholars (such as Jaideva Singh), include Jnana Yoga practices, such as Ramana Maharshiâs Self-enquiry, in this Way, which does not mesh with Daâs categorization and description.
Da has little understanding of (or else purposely misinterprets) the âDivine Wayâ (Sambhavopaya). The Divine Way (or Way of Sambha, or Siva) implies the practice of uniting, temporarily, the âvineâ of oneâ soul (contracted Siva) with âvineâ of Shakti in oneâs spiritual Heart-center (Hridayam). This is facilitated through the practice of motiveless presence, or âchoiceless awarenessâ (the Krishnamurti term that Jaideva Singh uses to describe this Wayâs sadhana). This Way has nothing to do with absorption in the Void; and, in fact, Jaideva Singh castigates Madhyamika Buddhism for its quasi-apotheosis of voidness.
The âNull Way,â as Da has it, is a misnomer. This Way (Anupaya), is the No-Means Way, which means the Way of effortless, Di-vine Be-ing. Contrary to what Da says, this is a Seventh-Stage Way that involves no inversion of attention into the Heart-root, but is itself the Way of standing free (or un-contracted) as spontaneously united Attention (or Awareness) and Energy (or Shakti-Bliss). This Way does not involve dualistic absorption in Bliss, but is non-dual Be-ing-Consciousness-Bliss itself.
Da summarizes Kashmir Shaivism thus: âThe tradition of Kashmir Shavism (like the tradition of Saiva Siddhanta) is entirely a fourth-to-fifth stage Yogic (and Devotional) tradition (and a religious tradition associated with the first five stages of life.â
I summarize Daâs description of Kashmir Shaivism thus: It indicates that he is either philosophically challenged with regard to explicating Dharmas other than his own--or that he intentionally engages in straw-man arguments and one-upmanship in order to bolster his own self-proclaimed status as the First and Only Seventh Stage spiritual master. Anyone who has studied Kashmir Shaivism and read Daâs âThe Knee of Listeningâ will reject Daâs diminishment of this great tantric tradition, for it couldnât be clearer that Daâs sadhana, which was all was all about uniting himself with the Shakti (culminating in his permanent union with it in his Vedana Temple Awakening in 1969) is the very same sadhana that Kashmir Shaivism is all about.
Dissing Da’s “Deconstruction” of Kashmir Shaivism
Previous post: 2017 Update: My Plans for the Year
Next post: The Exoteric Perennial Philosophy, Part 1
{ 30 comments… read them below or add one }
Indeed! Those in the Kashmiri Shaivite world–including all Rudi and Muktananda descendants–would wholeheartedly agree. For one thing, Da was no Sanskrit scholar; for another, he tied his views on Kashmir Shaivism too closely to his views on Muktananda. Otherwise there’s no way he could mistake Anupaya for anything other than the 7th stage described to a T. And then, of course, there is the issue of Da’s narcissism you mention–which plays out in his devaluation of Aurobindo, as well, and in Ramana’s eventual demotion from 7th- to 6th-stage realizer. No one who knows what they’re talking about can doubt Da’s attainment and transmission, but his human personality nevertheless had its own very human flaws.
Ironically, Kashmir Shaivism’s foremost exemplar, Abhinavagupta, also systematically Basket-of-Toleranced all “lesser” views under his own–and justifiably so, if one reads his critiques of the competitor traditions of his day. But he did so a whole lot more grace and sensitivity than Da evinced any time after the late 70s or so…
In recent times Sri Ramana Maharshi is the only one to have realized the highest state of all (even though it is not a state) which is the absolute Self. The fact that Sri Ramana Maharshi could induce samadhi on the people who came to visit him in his ashrama just by his silent gaze and stare of his eyes speaks for itself. Even Somerset Maugham has described it very accurately. If any one has reached the 7th stage of ultimate Self realization it is Bhagavan Sri Ramana Mahrashi and no one else. I don’t wish to say anything about Franklin Jones but he was no match for Bhagavan Sri Ramana Maharshi’s depths of intense sahaja samadhi.
IJ, what do you know/think of Sri Satishji? One member of my Facebook group — Meditation-Consciousness-Spirituality — continually submits posts that promote him and his teachings.
Mr. Gardner,
I have not heard of Sri Satishji whatever his full or actual name is . All these swamis from India are honored with the title “Ji” after their names as a mark of respect and honor. But then there are thousands like him in India who are as mediocre as any non-duality gurus we find on YouTube like James Swartz and their likes. I am quite sure this fellow Satish is just as good as those unenlightened clowns. Lol! That is the sorry state of affairs.
It is for this reason I respect and admire only Bhagavan Sri Ramana Maharshi. No one else of his stature has been born in India since Sri Ramana Maharshi and I am 100% certain of this. I tried to look up your Facebook correspondence to find out what you said about the the member you mentioned and his admiration for fellow guru Satish. But I don’t have a Facebook account to access your Facebook activity. If I had I would certainly have posted some comments in your support about your depth and knowledge on spirituality. I will try to find who this guy Satish is. Best wishes to you.
IJ
Mr Gradner,
Since this topic came I wanted to ask you this. There is this gentleman from Auckland, NZ by the name of John R E Harger who has written some book reviews at Amazon. He also has posted something about his book on the blog goldenagebeyond. His book is titled ” the journey to enlightenment” .
He seems quite authentic unlike so many other clowns one comes across these days at Amazon, Youtube and BATGAP. It appears he was struck by lightning in 1996 and had a tremendous Kundalini Shakti rising experience which awakened him to a different spiritual dimension altogether. Before that he was an average person and knew nothing of Siva-Shakti or Kundalini Shakti. He posts reviews comments which are somewhat similar to your liking. But I doubt very much if he has attained moksha or liberataion from future births.
IJ.
Harger is a professor and scientist, so he might be worth reading. The Kindle versions of his books are very reasonably priced, so I’ll buy one and check him out.
There is another interesting Advaita-Vedanta Westerner — Ramaji. Eventually, I’ll review a couple of his books.
I read Harger’s “Journey to Enlightenment,” and it’s unimpressive. I’m not inspired to spend the time to review it.
Mr. Gardner,
I am sorry I misspelled your name again.
IJ.
Dear Mr. Gardner,
What do you think about Trika guru Gabriel Pradīpaka, does his teaching also in the “Muktananda-style”?
His site and blog:
https://www.sanskrit-sanscrito.com/en/english-home/100
https://www.parabhairavayoga.com/en/
Thanks.
Never heard of him. I’ll have to check him out.
More info on Gabriel
Spiritual lineage: In 1983 (April) he received spontaneous initiation in the form of Śaktipāta (lit. “descent of Power”, i.e. divine Grace) by repeating the sacred mantra “Om̐ namaḥ śivāya” while he was watching a photo of Svāmī Muktānanda. Hence, despite Svāmī Muktānanda having passed away in 1982, Gabriel Pradīpaka considers him as his Guru. A few months later (October, 1983), he was “formally” initiated by Svāmī Alakṣānanda, also belonging to the Muktānanda’s spiritual lineage. As you surely know… or maybe not… Muktānanda is the Master who brought the Siddha Yoga path to the West. Gabriel Pradīpaka was learning/working in the well-known Siddha Yoga community till 1989. Since late 1989 through late 1991 and since late 1994 through late 1997, he was learning/teaching/working with another teacher (a disciple of the great Muktānanda too), who was crucial in his life as a yogī. And since 1997 he is “on his own”.
He also recognizes Svāmī Lakṣmaṇa Joo as his Trika Guru.
In February of 2016, he founded the Parabhairavayoga, a brandnew spiritual movement that is just starting to spread around the world.
In short, he is a spiritual guru, conversant with Sanskrit language and Trika philosophy, who sheds light on spirituality as a whole and helps spiritual aspirants out with the process known as Self-realization or Final Liberation.
End of info on Gabriel.
Oh please! Have I not heard this kind of poppycock before.
LOL!
Gabriel has 155 lengthy videos in YouTube. I just checked a few. Sorry, I am not falling for Gabriel’s theoretical mumbo-jumbo even if it makes sense. Show me one who is of the caliber of Sri Ramana Maharshi and I will come to you and humbly prostrate before you as a token of immense gratitude and thanks. Lol!
IJ
Yes, his theoretical discourses are very tedious, but looks “tidy”, and he always explain it by the low level of spiritual aspirants. So, it would be good to reveal doctrinal inconsistencies in his teaching, which, as I suspect, have place. Waiting for Mr. Gardner’s comments.
I can’t listen to Pradipaka. He’s a terrible speaker, even apart from his poor English. Moreover, I don’t have much respect for Laksmanjoo, and even less for Muktananda. Let me know when he writes a book in English and it’s available.
Dunkelheit,
To realize the Self one ought to experience death while living. This happened to Sri Ramana Maharshi at age 16. This death experience erased his jiva or ego and he realized he was Self or Brahman. This was irreversible meaning he never identified himself as a person called Vanktaramana or by his body called Venkataramana ever again after his death experience. After this death experience this he was in constant sahaja samadhi till his his physical body died. He also had another prolonged death experience while he was in Virupaksha cave. An older lady living in the hills admonished him to stop these experiences and live a normal life as she feared for his life.
This kind of sahaja samdhi or akrama mukti or instantaneous liberation is very rare and has not happened to Gabriel. I doubt very much if he has achieved moksha or even is in nirvikalpa samadhi when alone let alone sahaja samdhi. There are thousands of them like Gabriel who may have had a kind of awakening but it is not irreversible Self realization or moksha. One can easily make out that people like Gabriel are rookies. They can fool only beginners or who know nothing about samadhi.
I readily beleive what you say, but for me it is interesting to explore how the low level of spiritual realisation can distort Kashmir Shaivism doctrinally.
Dunkelheit,
I don’t know what you mean from your last comment. I never said Gabriel has distorted Kashmir Shaivism. Mr.Gardner who is an expert in Kashmir Shaivism is better knowledgeable than I to say such things but he has not done that.
I looked up the link you gave above and glanced through it quickly. It is very good but it is all only theory. Any pundit, Sanskrit or other can explain theoretically what the Self is just from studying about it from various sources.
Like I said Gabriel is a very good pundit at best without having realized the Self. He is not spiritually enlightened within which matters the utmost. Or like Mr.Gardner would say Gabriel has not cut his Heart-knot as yet for irreversible Self realization to have taken place in him.
Oops! I realized here were some spelling and grammatical errors in the above comment. But this website has no options to edit. Anyway you got the gist of the comment about Gabriel. He considers himself a Guru? Lol!
It is I who suspect that he distorted Kashmir Shaivism doctrinally, but it is difficult to explore, because he is a good pandit. That is why I have written to see Mr. Gardner’s comments.
Dunkelheit,
Oh I see. Okay. Maybe he did. You should know better. Maybe you can quote a few examples where Gabriel has distorted Kashmir Shaivism. I have come across so many of these Sanskrit and spiritual pandits in India. But they never see the utmost need to actually realize the Self for themselves, practically I mean. I know they have not and in each case I sincerely wish they had. They are obsessed with the Self only in theory. What is the use of understanding all these in theory whatever the spiritual or religious doctrine is without actually having realized the Self within like Bhagavan Sri Ramana Maharshi did? I would love to meet such a person who has actually realized the Self irreversibly as did Bhagavan Sri Ramana.
Actually, he has book in english:
http://www.amazon.in/dp/1943851638
ОК. Can I ask, why gurus, which adhere to Kashmir Shaivism (Muktananda, Shankarananda, Pradīpaka etc.), have the need to found “new” brands of yoga and cannot simply state that they belong to the tradition of Kashmir Shaivism (Vasugupta, Abhinavagupta)? Is it a mark of deliberate or unconcious eclecticism or the doctrinal necessity to preserve the status of the “last” master of Trika for Swami Lakshmanjoo?
Lakshmanjoo, Muktananda, and Shankarananda are poor representatives of Kashmir Shaivism, and don’t impress me. I have no idea what the thinking of Muktananda and Shankarananda was regarding their relation with Kashmir Shaivism, nor do care to know.
Dunkelheit,
You are barking up the wrong tree, sir. Mr. Gardner considers himself as the ultimate expert in Kashmir Shaivism who is living today as far as I have understood from his reviews and comments at Amazon. He gives a hoot to all those 4 self pretentious gurus you have specifically mentioned here. Have you read the English book ” Recognizing the Self ” by Gabriel?
Why then I’m barking up the wrong tree? I simply want to understand, why there are many alike brands of yoga, which have no reason to exist, because they must be simply Kashmir Shaivism. No, I didn’t read this book.
Dunkelheit, the aforementioned KS “gurus” do not truly grok Kashmir Shaivism. Ramana Maharshi is unique in that he, in effect, combines Kashmir Shaivism with Advaita Vedanta. Unlike other Advaita Vedanta gurus, he freely discusses the Energetic Dimension (Kundalini, Shaktipat, Amrita Nadi) of Self-Awakening.
So, the situation is: they have no authority in Kashmir Shaivism and they don’t actually teach Trika, except Lakshmanjoo who has only formal authority. Did I understand correctly?
Correct. Only the late Lakshmanjoo was a formal lineage holder in the Kashmir Shaivism tradition. But I don’t put much weight on that. Anybody can teach Kashmir Shaivism. Moreover, with Lakshmanjoo gone, the Kashmir Shaivism lineage is effectually ended. So only non-lineage holders are left to carry on the tradition.
Dunkelheit,
They may (all 4 you mentioned) have all dabbled in Kashmir Shaivism. But none of them has actually realized Self or was or is in sahaja samadhi. As Mr.Gardner would say none of the 4 people you mentioned had or has cut the Heart knot or attained liberation. If you feel you have grasped Kashmir Shaivism thoroughly and correctly maybe you should teach it yourself. Why should you listen to Gabriel or bother what he says when you say that he has distorted Kashmir Shaivism anyway?
Because I thought that traditional authority is the serious thing about which I cannot decide alone. And when all authoritative Trika gurus turned out to remain in the Middle Ages, one willy-nilly starts to doubt one’s knowledge.
Dunkelheit,
Don’t ever underestimate your Self. Because of your Self everything else you see IS and is happening. Your Self is most important first and foremost and not Kashmir Shaivism or these 4 Trika Gurus.