The Sad State of Spiritual Literature, Part 1

by L. Ron Gardner

I doubt that there is a better-read mystic than yours truly. Moreover, I doubt that there is a living mystic with my overall knowledge and understanding of mysticism and spiritual philosophy. As I read book after book, it is apparent to me that I have no peers in the field of spiritual exegesis and elaboration.

I wish this weren’t the case. I wish that I could point people to living spiritual masters and great spiritual writers, but all I see is a vast wasteland of mediocrity (and less-than-mediocrity). There are some high-integrity spiritual teachers, and a few teachers who are true experts in a specific tradition – but no one, other than me, seems capable of putting it all together, in forging a deep and wide esoteric perennial philosophy.

In the forthcoming weeks, I will, for both fun and educational purposes, be commenting on some of these teacher-writers (as well as some dead ones, too). Dale Carnegie is probably turning over in his grave right now, wondering why I would “stir up a hornet’s nest” by “digging into the Dharmas” of these teachers. But unlike me, Dale Carnegie didn’t have Scorpio rising and five planets in the eighth house. So stay tuned for the forthcoming “fun and education.”

{ 9 comments… read them below or add one }

Sage February 27, 2016 at 6:31 am

you can’t be for real

Reply

Bernard March 24, 2016 at 3:17 pm

Why not?
And in any case what does it mean to be ‘for real’?
Please elaborate.

Reply

L. Ron Gardner February 28, 2016 at 1:23 am

Sage, point me to someone (living) whom you consider my equal or superior in the field of spiritual exegesis and elaboration. I’d love to find such an individual.

Reply

Eliot March 2, 2016 at 11:34 am

Usually it’s laughable when somebody claims to the “greatest spiritual master”, but I have to admit that Gardner is the best out there at Perennial Philosophy.

That being said I think Gardner gets a few things wrong pertaining to Togal and the final attainment of the body of light, and also doesn’t emphasize the Vows of a Bodhisattva (The Commitment to enlighten all beings no matter how difficult or long the road).

He (erroneously) thinks that the Ground of Being is a “Person” who is pure love floating somewhere outside of space and time.

And this God of love decides to create the universe and it’s myriad injustices and sufferings purely for his own entertainment.

That being said, I still admire his teachings and his attitude in general.

There are other great masters who are more realized, but they limit themselves to their own traditions and keep the real esoteric methods very secret.

Reply

Bernard March 24, 2016 at 3:15 pm

Greetings Eliot
Let’s start at the end:

‘ There are other great masters who are more realised’.

How do you know know?

Are there degrees of realisation and if so how do you discern who is realised and to what degree they are realised?

What are the qualifications for being ‘realised’?

How does a realised person behave, how act?

Unless you are realised yourself, you can’t even ask the question in the context of ‘knowing’.

Reply

L. Ron Gardner March 3, 2016 at 12:15 am

Eliot, you’ll be glad to know that by no later than early next year I’ll have written and published a text on Dzogchen contemplation.

Reply

Eliot March 3, 2016 at 3:11 pm

I’m looking forward to it. I hope you take the visionary dimension into account.
Look up the books “Primordial Grace” and “Luminous Heart of Inner Radiance” by Olds.
Also

“Naked Seeing: The Great Perfection, the Wheel of Time, and Visionary Buddhism in Renaissance Tibet” by Hatchell and

“Rainbow Body and Resurrection” by Tiso.

Interestingly Tiso talks about a sect of Shaivites who taught a doctrine of bodily immortality and whose great masters disappeared at death.

Reply

Shaam June 21, 2016 at 11:40 pm

Hi Ron,

How about David Lane ( Neural Surfer ) , pretty well read guy who “gets it” in my opinion.

Reply

L. Ron Gardner June 22, 2016 at 7:38 am

David Lane does not impress me.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: